Spread the love
Compensatory Damages

Washington, D.C. Special Needs

Washington, D.C. uses a hybrid model—combining elements of the income shares and percentage of income approaches—to determine child support, as outlined in D.C. Code § 16-916.01. This model ensures that both parents contribute fairly to their child’s financial needs based on income and time spent with the child.

When a child has special needs, the court may deviate from standard guidelines to cover extraordinary expenses that impact the child’s well-being.

Special Needs and Deviations

  • Additional Expenses: The courts consider additional costs for medical care, special education, and other services when determining support obligations. This ensures that all necessary expenses for a child’s special needs are covered.

Case Law

In Washington, D.C., cases like Smith v. Smith have highlighted the importance of considering a child’s special needs in support calculations to provide an adequate living standard.

Child Support Arrears

Washington, D.C. has stringent enforcement mechanisms for child support arrears, including wage garnishment and legal penalties for non-compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions

D.C. employs a hybrid model under D.C. Code § 16-916.01, blending income shares and percentage of income approaches to apportion support based on both parents’ incomes and parenting time. For children with special needs, courts have discretion to deviate from guidelines to cover extraordinary expenses, ensuring equitable contributions aligned with the child’s well-being.

Courts may deviate if standard guidelines would be unjust, particularly for children with disabilities requiring additional costs like medical care or special education. This discretion allows for increased support based on the child’s reasonable needs and family circumstances, as outlined in § 16-916.01.

Courts evaluate costs for medical treatments, therapies, special education, adaptive equipment, and other services essential to the child’s health and development. These are factored into deviations to provide an adequate standard of living, with both parents sharing responsibility proportionally.

In cases like Jaw v. Dme (1991), D.C. courts emphasized adjusting support to meet the child’s specific needs, including potential extraordinary medical expenses. More recently, Builta v. Guzman (2024) highlighted discretion in shared custody deviations, reinforcing that special needs warrant tailored obligations beyond basic guidelines.

D.C. enforces arrears through wage garnishment, tax refund intercepts, license suspensions, and legal penalties for non-compliance, managed by the Child Support Services Division. The Child Support Reform Amendment Act of 2025, effective October 1, 2025, increases passthrough of collected support to TANF families, benefiting those with special needs by directing more funds directly to child-related expenses without reducing benefits.